ethresear.ch: Wormholes and the cost of plausible deniability
(Pierre), 18:21: explains why wormholes' plausible deniability seems incompatible with Ethereum's 160 bit addresses and examines EIP-7503's claimed anonymity set.
以太坊研究日报
mmjahanara and Pierre argued that the plausible deniability of wormholes (EIP-7503) is incompatible with Ethereum's 160 bit addresses, and revisited EIP-7503's claimed anonymity set. miha-stopar asked whether FHE deserves its attention, given its promise of general composable computation over encrypted state without trusted hardware.

Image: ethresear.ch, Wormholes and the cost of plausible deniability
(Pierre), 18:21: explains why wormholes' plausible deniability seems incompatible with Ethereum's 160 bit addresses and examines EIP-7503's claimed anonymity set.
(miha-stopar), 00:19: FHE promises fully general, composable computation over encrypted state without trusted hardware.
(cfries), submitted and merged; ERC-8033: Agent Council Oracles (phiraml), submitted; EIP-7906: correct the CALL opcode value from 0xFA to 0xF1 (mattvaux), submitted.
ERC-7573: rename to key decryption oracle (cfries), submitted and merged; ERC-8033: Agent Council Oracles (phiraml), submitted; EIP-7906: correct the CALL opcode value from 0xFA to 0xF1 (mattvaux), submitted.
ERC-7573: rename to key decryption oracle (cfries), submitted and merged; ERC-8033: Agent Council Oracles (phiraml), submitted; EIP-7906: correct the CALL opcode value from 0xFA to 0xF1 (mattvaux), submitted.
13:09; aztecnetwork: Zac explains Aztec and programmable privacy, 22:00.
Tkstanczak quoting Messari: the narrative says Ethereum lost ground this year, but the data shows it reinforced its central role onchain, 13:09; aztecnetwork: Zac explains Aztec and programmable privacy, 22:00.