Saturday's discussion centered on native AA. Responding to Base's plan to ship 8130, lightclient said half of 8130 is application-layer detail that does not belong in the protocol, while 8141 supports permissionless innovation without forcing wallets and users into specific patterns. Hudson Jameson asked what came of the AA wars, since smart wallets using AA do not seem to have taken off. In the spec, EIP-8141 gets a PR accounting block execution gas before refunds (submitted), and the calldata floor fix was merged. dapplion submitted an EIP removing the sync committee, cutting issuance by about 3%.
01:03. 8141 supports permissionless innovation and does not force wallets and users into specific use patterns, which matters because we cannot assume we will always be around to tweak the account system.
02:04. Some compromise EIPs were accepted, but smart wallets using AA do not seem to have taken off; did the fighting wash away the best EIPs, or is it an adoption issue.
(AnkushinDaniil), submitted. EIP-8141 adopts EIP-8037's two-dimensional gas model and activates in the same fork as EIP-7778; EIP-8037 accounts the block execution dimension before the storage refund, so a refund lowers the payer's cost without freeing the block capacity the transaction occupied, the DoS bound EIP-7778 exists to keep.
18:54, with PR 12228. It removes the sync committee, its aggregate, subnets, domains and rewards, and the Altair light client protocol built on it; `SYNC_REWARD_WEIGHT` is removed and not redistributed, so consensus issuance falls by 2/64.
Dapplion: just wrote an EIP to reduce ETH issuance by 3% by removing the sync committee, 18:54, with PR 12228. It removes the sync committee, its aggregate, subnets, domains and rewards, and the Altair light client protocol built on it; `SYNC_REWARD_WEIGHT` is removed and not redistributed, so consensus issuance falls by 2/64.