gakonst: the main thing he thinks about is how dead privacy is from here on
01:45.
The privacy debate
Vitalik: it's only dead if you give up; I'm not giving up on privacy, I'm doubling down
03:52.
pcaversaccio: privacy is not dead, we have just built the wrong defaults
16:28; any privacy must be part of the runtime (an execution layer, a browser and so on) rather than something users configure, which is why he has argued for years that L1 must ship privacy (the post is long, and only the visible part is cited here).
Derek Chiang: thinking about privacy in counterfactuals
21:42, imagining Ethereum transactions had been private from day one and a 2027 upgrade took privacy away, and asking how the community would react.
Other updates
EIP-8360: clarify ephemeral account semantics and fix EIP-684 references
Merged.
EIP-8141: add EIP-7976 to requires
(later closed), since 8141's intrinsic gas calculation directly uses EIP-7976's constants.
ERC-7962: clarify privacy scope in Security Considerations
Merged.
Community
binji's reflection on Vitalik's post
04:37; LefterisJP: why privacy matters, 21:53.
LefterisJP: why privacy matters
Binji's reflection on Vitalik's post, 04:37; LefterisJP: why privacy matters, 21:53.