Back to all reports

以太坊研究日报

Ethereum Research Daily

Nethermind measured the frame transaction validation budget: once clients pause validation while processing a block, raising MAX_VERIFY_GAS to 300k is workable, which is the range private transfers and post-quantum accounts need. Trail of Bits published a four-step guide for signing systems after the Binance incident, stressing that 7702 delegations should be treated as admin privileges. A token-level Protected Accounts proposal appeared on Magicians. Francesco and Barnabé discussed what gas repricing really does.

Image for November 7, 2026

Image: Trail of Bits, After Binance, check what your signing systems can approve

How large can EIP-8141's validation budget be: a mempool DoS benchmark

ethresear.ch: a mempool DoS benchmark for the EIP-8141 validation budget

Posted at 06:26 by Stefano De Angelis, Daniil Ankushin and Manuel Arto of Nethermind. In a frame transaction the signature check is arbitrary EVM code in a VERIFY frame, and a node must simulate the validation prefix before admitting the transaction. If validation fails, nobody pays for that work, which is a DoS vector.

https://ethresear.ch/t/how-large-can-eip-8141s-validation-budget-be-a-mempool-dos-benchmark/26224

After Binance: signing systems and account-level protection

Trail of Bits: after Binance, check what your signing systems can approve

(published 11-06 US time; Trail of Bits announcement post at 00:53). The core point: if a server allowed to request signatures is compromised, a key can be misused without ever being extracted. A 7702 delegation is like the wallet signing a standing instruction, "use this code when my account is called", which stays in place until changed or cleared with the wallet's key, so funds deposited after the first theft were moved too. Four recommendations: reduce access to signing infrastructure; treat delegation as an administrative privilege; limit the damage even if signing is compromised; monitor changes in wallet authority. The post also notes that 7702 authorizations sit outside ordinary calldata, and that session keys, recovery paths, Safe modules and ERC-4337 UserOps all need monitoring too.

https://blog.trailofbits.com/2026/11/06/after-binance-check-what-your-signing-systems-can-approve/

Trail of Bits announcement post

Trail of Bits: after Binance, check what your signing systems can approve (published 11-06 US time; Trail of Bits announcement post at 00:53). The core point: if a server allowed to request signatures is compromised, a key can be misused without ever being extracted. A 7702 delegation is like the wallet signing a standing instruction, "use this code when my account is called", which stays in place until changed or cleared with the wallet's key, so funds deposited after the first theft were moved too. Four recommendations: reduce access to signing infrastructure; treat delegation as an administrative privilege; limit the damage even if signing is compromised; monitor changes in wallet authority. The post also notes that 7702 authorizations sit outside ordinary calldata, and that session keys, recovery paths, Safe modules and ERC-4337 UserOps all need monitoring too.

https://x.com/trailofbits/status/2118763769593741553

Magicians: draft ERC, Protected Accounts for Fungible Tokens

Opened at 14:28. An optional "protected" flag for ERC-20s: small transfers are instant, transfers above the limit are queued and can be cancelled by a pre-registered backup wallet. A "stress" action cancels all pending transfers and moves the balance to the backup, locked for a preset duration the caller cannot choose, which also helps against coercion. Over-limit `transferFrom` calls revert, so routers and lending protocols cannot be fooled. The reference implementation is a 1:1 USDC wrapper (pUSDC) on Base Sepolia, built at ETHGlobal Mumbai. Turning protection on is instant; weakening it (turning it off, raising the limit, shortening the wait, changing the backup) waits for a delay the holder chooses.

https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/erc-xxxx-protected-accounts-for-fungible-tokens/30297

What gas repricing actually does

Other updates

Community